Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 316 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 360 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £100.0 vs £328.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-9900KF - £0.3 vs £0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.91/FPS
32%
Price, £
£328.88
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13899 minutes ago
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |