Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 851 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |