Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2756 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1280 - 62 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |