Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2187 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |