Buy on Amazon
£516.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 385 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 47% better in F1 23 than Celeron G4900 - 235 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - £59.75 vs £516.66
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i9-9900 3.1GHz LGA1151 Box
Buy for £516.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
38.23711980136561%
Multi-Core
1051
14.589117157134925%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
