Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800XT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1197 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - 225 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £365.0 vs £512.32
- Up to 18% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - £1.88 vs £2.28 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.28/FPS
82%
Price, £
£512.32
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 791 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
194
86%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£365
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |