Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 225 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £69.99 vs £512.32
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - £0.38 vs £2.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.28/FPS
16%
Price, £
£512.32
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
80%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |