Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 48% better in New World than Core i3-7100 - 164 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £64.99 vs £481.82
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £481.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75911 minutes ago
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
41.29139072847682%
Multi-Core
2440
13.355227148330599%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |