Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £58.88 vs £545.03
- Up to 89% better value when playing Control than Core i9-14900 - £0.29 vs £2.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i3-7100 - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
201
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Buy for £545.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |