Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 22% better in Remnant II than Core i5-9400 - 107 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £188.88 vs £533.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900KS - £2.15 vs £4.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.99/FPS
43%
Price, £
£533.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 469 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
88
82%
Value, £/FPS
£2.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |