Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1594 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-9100 - 597 vs 532 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £180.63 vs £533.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-13900KS - £0.34 vs £0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
597
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
38%
Price, £
£533.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
532
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£180.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £180.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |