Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 361 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-14100F - 240 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £106.97 vs £533.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-13900KS - £0.49 vs £2.22 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.22/FPS
22%
Price, £
£533.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£106.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £106.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |