Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700 - 214 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £250.0 vs £465.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900KF - £1.4 vs £2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
64%
Price, £
£465.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for £250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |