Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 245 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-12600 - 263 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £280.27 vs £465.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900KF - £1.1 vs £1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
62%
Price, £
£465.99
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
255
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£280.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £280.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |