Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10500 - 237 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £179.99 vs £489.35
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900K - £0.83 vs £2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.06/FPS
40%
Price, £
£489.35
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for £489.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
218
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |