Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3349 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Rocket League than Core i5-3330 - 786 vs 677 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - £59.99 vs £356.44
- Up to 80% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-12900K - £0.09 vs £0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
786
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
20%
Price, £
£356.44
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for £356.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
677
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |