Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £241.49 vs £520.28
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £1.62 vs £3.23 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900KF - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
149
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£241.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £241.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.23/FPS
50%
Price, £
£520.28
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for £520.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |