Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 81% better in F1 23 than Core i5-3470 - 290 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - £63.02 vs £258.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-11900K - £0.39 vs £0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
290
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
43%
Price, £
£258.88
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
160
55%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£63.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £63.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |