Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £63.11 vs £238.88
- Up to 66% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-11900KF - £0.28 vs £0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-3470 - 290 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
229
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£63.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16499 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
290
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
34%
Price, £
£238.88
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |