Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Athlon 3000G - 74 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - £51.44 vs £345.74
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-11900K - £1.01 vs £4.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
74
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.67/FPS
21.627408993576015%
Price, £
£345.74
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £345.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1630 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
51
68.91891891891892%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£51.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1630 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
40.362716153521724%
Multi-Core
1975
18.039824625502373%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |