Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than Core i7-4765T - 71 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £93.43 vs £228.97
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74698 minutes ago
Buy for £93.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
42.00829111008752%
Multi-Core
2911
31.741358630465598%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |