Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400F - 204 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £101.05 vs £228.97
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74218 minutes ago
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
66.23675725472133%
Multi-Core
5751
62.70853778213935%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |