Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1314 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - £99.99 vs £288.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75230 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
94.9367088607595%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
55.11737089201878%
Multi-Core
6976
79.12885662431943%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |