Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1610 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £5.56 vs £764.99
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.432835820895523%
Multi-Core
739
6.511586923958059%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |