Buy on Amazon
£764.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 921 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 112 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £220.6 vs £764.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10920X - £2.18 vs £6.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.83/FPS
31%
Price, £
£764.99
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10920X Desktop Processor 12 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18341 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
101
90%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Desktop CPU - AM4 / Hex Core / 3.2 GHz /19MB / 65W
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
