Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2729 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - 179 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - £215.0 vs £565.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900X - £1.37 vs £3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.16/FPS
43.35443037974684%
Price, £
£565
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58172 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
87.70949720670392%
Value, £/FPS
£1.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
44.86040609137056%
Multi-Core
2469
26.347241489702274%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |