Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3572 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-540 - 219 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 73 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |