Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |