Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3570K - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £110.16 vs £270.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74751 minutes ago
Buy for £110.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
686
38.91094724900737%
Multi-Core
2071
22.623989512781296%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |