Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900K - 71 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £319.0 vs £449.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900K - £4.49 vs £7.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11518 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£319
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |