Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-6700K - 260 vs 258 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £117.88 vs £243.01
- Up to 51% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900F - £0.46 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.93/FPS
49%
Price, £
£243.01
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for £243.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
258
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £117.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |