Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700K - 180 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £102.88 vs £325.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74392 minutes ago
Buy for £102.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1480
88.3054892601432%
Multi-Core
4897
58.117730833135525%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |