Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 298 days older than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900F - 305 vs 301 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74739 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
98.99586532782044%
Multi-Core
8426
84.78567116119945%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |