Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - 168 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £199.49 vs £269.76
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900 - £1.39 vs £1.61 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
86%
Price, £
£269.76
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for £269.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
144
85%
Value, £/FPS
£1.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£199.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £199.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |