Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £194.0 vs £224.84
- Up to 5% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10400 - £1.75 vs £1.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £194 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6504 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.84/FPS
95%
Price, £
£224.84
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |