Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1213 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 10% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3930 - 501 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 75767 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.68075117370892%
Multi-Core
1043
12.385702410640066%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
