Buy on Amazon
£379.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $374
Availability
MSRP in USD: $374
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 798 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i7-9700KF - 228 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £244.03 vs £379.99
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-9700KF Processor (12m Cache, Up to 4.90 GHz)
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74734 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & select 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £244.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1666
78.51083883129122%
Multi-Core
7107
86.79775280898876%
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
