Buy on Amazon
£244.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1800X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1475 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 70% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 1800X - 75 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X - £244.03 vs £295.0
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1800X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & select 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £244.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75095 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Processor (8-Core 3.6 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) Socket AM4 95W) - YD180XBCAEWOF
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen 7 1800X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1800X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1131
53.29877474081055%
Multi-Core
5735
70.04152418172936%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
