Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 2600X - 421 vs 407 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £115.93 vs £328.66
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-9700F - £0.28 vs £0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
421
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
35.8974358974359%
Price, £
£328.66
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3038 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
407
96.67458432304038%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£115.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £115.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
79.85797288573274%
Multi-Core
5263
84.1272378516624%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |