Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 742 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2600X - 176 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - £98.8 vs £195.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2600X - £0.56 vs £1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2910 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |