Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3408 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Core i7-940XM - 180 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Clarksfield | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |