Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4950 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 68% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-940XM - 738 vs 440 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 28 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
738
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£359.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £359.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |