Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3229 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-940XM - 235 vs 222 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
235
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £258.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |