Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2860 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-940XM - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
