Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4851 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 42% better in New World than Core i7-920XM - 138 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
