Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3872 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-920XM - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |