Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-8809G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 819 days newer than Core i7-8809G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-8809G - 416 vs 415 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
416
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |