Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 877 days older than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8320 - 373 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
