Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1710 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8320 - 98 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Vishera | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
