Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 496 vs 469 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 85 vs 95 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
496
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |