Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 2409 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 117 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£149.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £149.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |